How Much Is Data Privacy Worth? A Preliminary Study on WTA and WTP in India

Abstract

What is the value of data privacy for Indian consumers? This study examines how much people in India are willing to pay (WTP) to protect their data and how much compensation they would accept (WTA) to give access to it. Replicating a study by Winegar and Sunstein (2019), we find that consumers are willing to pay ₹300 per month to keep their data private but demand ₹3800 to share it. This large gap shows that people value losing privacy much more than gaining it, a pattern called the “superendowment effect.” It also highlights challenges like low awareness and lack of information about data use, which make these valuations unreliable for creating laws or policies. In India, where digital knowledge varies widely, relying only on such measures may lead to policies that do not protect consumers effectively.

In India, privacy means different things to different people. Studies show that only 11% of users truly understand privacy risks (Punagin & Arya, 2015). Many trust companies to safeguard their data, even when they don’t fully know what happens with it (Dhotre & Olesen, 2015). Married individuals and women are often more careful about privacy, likely because they consider how data use might impact their families or social standing (Kumaraguru & Sachdeva, 2014). India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP), 2023, makes consent a key part of data protection. But consent doesn’t work well if people don’t fully understand what they are agreeing to. Our study suggests that privacy laws in India need to go beyond just asking for consent. Companies should be made to explain, transparently, how the data is being used and shared. Simultaneously, more awareness campaigns should be carried out to help people make better decisions about their data. Privacy law in India needs to take cognisance of the peculiar interplay
of trust, cultural values, and lesser awareness in the country.

Download the full paper

Total
0
Shares
Prev
Mid-18th century Shahjahanabad

Mid-18th century Shahjahanabad

By Shubham Mishra and Khushi Kesari Shubham Mishra, presented the work (jointly

Next
What Renewed Sanctions on Chabahar Implies

What Renewed Sanctions on Chabahar Implies

Manashjyoti Karjee, Researcher, Security & Society, Advanced Study Institute

You May Also Like
We are pleased to bring to you the new edition of the Decypher Journal. Decypher was started keeping in mind, the critical role that informed discourse plays in shaping our understanding of Asia’s evolving landscape. Our Journal is conceived as a bridge, linking local insights from Asia with a global audience keen on nuanced perspectives.
Decypher Journal: (Em)Powered? Authority in a Fragmented World
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

We are pleased to bring to you the new edition of the Decypher Journal. Decypher was started keeping in mind, the critical role that informed discourse plays in shaping our understanding of Asia’s evolving landscape. Our Journal is conceived as a bridge, linking local insights from Asia with a global audience keen on nuanced perspectives.
Decypher Journal: (Em)Powered? Authority in a Fragmented World
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.